<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Hackadelic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hackadelic.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hackadelic.com</link>
	<description>Think More, Code Less! - Intelligent WordPress Solutions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2015 18:01:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.5.32</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sliding Notes by batu akik termahal</title>
		<link>http://hackadelic.com/solutions/wordpress/sliding-notes/comment-page-2#comment-238604</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[batu akik termahal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2015 18:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadelic.com/?page_id=32#comment-238604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It works correctly when using the standard WP editor. I’ve installed and used the FolioPress fckeditor plugin and it works as it should as well, so I presume this is a problem Dean’s editor has when processing quoted strings.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It works correctly when using the standard WP editor. I’ve installed and used the FolioPress fckeditor plugin and it works as it should as well, so I presume this is a problem Dean’s editor has when processing quoted strings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stop Wasting SEO Juice &#8211; NoFollow Links To Flickr by Odovolenke</title>
		<link>http://hackadelic.com/stop-wasting-seo-juice-nofollow-links-to-flickr/comment-page-1#comment-178486</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Odovolenke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 11:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadelic.com/?p=239#comment-178486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I see, this discussion started more than 4 years ago and things have changed. I am trying to find a way how to increase pagerank of my site. I have too many outbound links to flickr, whose I changed to nofollow. I have changed backlinks with some PR4 sites, but nothing helped. My site is still PR0. I started FB page and Twitter account, but from these sites I have nofollow links. It is quite challenging to increase PR and I will be happy if PR of my site increase. Thanks for this post anyway.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see, this discussion started more than 4 years ago and things have changed. I am trying to find a way how to increase pagerank of my site. I have too many outbound links to flickr, whose I changed to nofollow. I have changed backlinks with some PR4 sites, but nothing helped. My site is still PR0. I started FB page and Twitter account, but from these sites I have nofollow links. It is quite challenging to increase PR and I will be happy if PR of my site increase. Thanks for this post anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hackadelic Series by a</title>
		<link>http://hackadelic.com/solutions/wordpress/series/comment-page-1#comment-157291</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[a]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 00:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadelic.com/?page_id=121#comment-157291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After I initially commented I appear to have clicked on the -Notify me when new comments 
are added- checkbox and now whenever a comment is added I receive 4 emails with the exact 
same comment. There has to be an easy method you can remove me from 
that service? Thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After I initially commented I appear to have clicked on the -Notify me when new comments<br />
are added- checkbox and now whenever a comment is added I receive 4 emails with the exact<br />
same comment. There has to be an easy method you can remove me from<br />
that service? Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Desktop Blogging Clients Rock by Zubaida</title>
		<link>http://hackadelic.com/why-desktop-blogging-clients-rock/comment-page-1#comment-72122</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zubaida]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2014 12:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadelic.com/?p=248#comment-72122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SmartXBlog is desktop blog editor for both windows and mac , it has WYSIWYG editor, image editor, online news, image and video search, drag and drop option, bookmarks , rss feed available from nearly 100 popular websites and you can even add your own rss, pop up alerts of your comments and you can preview and publish your post directly to your wordpress account .I think it is best available blogging desktop editor for windows and mac. Free trial can be downloaded from

http://www.smartxblog.com/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SmartXBlog is desktop blog editor for both windows and mac , it has WYSIWYG editor, image editor, online news, image and video search, drag and drop option, bookmarks , rss feed available from nearly 100 popular websites and you can even add your own rss, pop up alerts of your comments and you can preview and publish your post directly to your wordpress account .I think it is best available blogging desktop editor for windows and mac. Free trial can be downloaded from</p>
<p><a href="http://www.smartxblog.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.smartxblog.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Right Way To Shortcodize WordPress Widgets by Jesse</title>
		<link>http://hackadelic.com/the-right-way-to-shortcodize-wordpress-widgets/comment-page-1#comment-38864</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2013 21:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadelic.com/?p=58#comment-38864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I figured it out...your code was spot on of course, but I had extra white space in my functions.php when I copy/pasted]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I figured it out&#8230;your code was spot on of course, but I had extra white space in my functions.php when I copy/pasted</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Right Way To Shortcodize WordPress Widgets by Jesse</title>
		<link>http://hackadelic.com/the-right-way-to-shortcodize-wordpress-widgets/comment-page-1#comment-38832</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2013 21:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadelic.com/?p=58#comment-38832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I try this in my child theme&#039;s functions.php (both the widespread way and the correct way), it works fine on the frontend but then when I try to create a post it gives me this error:
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/manna/public_html/wp-content/themes/responsive-child/functions.php:6) in /home2/manna/public_html/wp-admin/post.php on line 222

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/manna/public_html/wp-content/themes/responsive-child/functions.php:6) in /home2/manna/public_html/wp-includes/pluggable.php on line 899

Any ideas? I know there are plugins that do this, but I like your plugin-less way.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I try this in my child theme&#8217;s functions.php (both the widespread way and the correct way), it works fine on the frontend but then when I try to create a post it gives me this error:<br />
Warning: Cannot modify header information &#8211; headers already sent by (output started at /home2/manna/public_html/wp-content/themes/responsive-child/functions.php:6) in /home2/manna/public_html/wp-admin/post.php on line 222</p>
<p>Warning: Cannot modify header information &#8211; headers already sent by (output started at /home2/manna/public_html/wp-content/themes/responsive-child/functions.php:6) in /home2/manna/public_html/wp-includes/pluggable.php on line 899</p>
<p>Any ideas? I know there are plugins that do this, but I like your plugin-less way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Windows XP Better than Windows 7? A User’s Perspective by CHOPPERGIRL</title>
		<link>http://hackadelic.com/is-windows-xp-better-than-windows-7-a-user%e2%80%99s-perspective/comment-page-1#comment-35050</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CHOPPERGIRL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Dec 2013 23:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadelic.com/?p=520#comment-35050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Comparison of start up and Shutdown time is an IDIOT test of the performance of an operating system. Do you measure the speed and performance of a car by how fast you can open the door and get in it, and how fast you can open the door and get out of it? Hell no.

You care about how fast the car goes and performs once you&#039;re in it and its up and running. And in that case, XP blows Windows 7 and 8 out the water, totally. I mean, blows them away. For memory footprint, for speed of file copies, for amount of webbrowser windows you can have open, for everything. Windows XP smokes 7.

And a true power user rarely boots or shutdowns his computer, instead putting it to sleep. I dare say Windows XP coming out of sleep is even faster than Windows 7.

When these reviews came out comparing start up and shut down time, people bought it. We were all duped. In reality, Windows 7 is just a rebranded Windows Vista that everyone hated.... slow, buggy, doggy... it is no way a fixed slimmed down Vista. After 4 years of slogging around on 7 x64 on a dual core machine, I reformated it and put XP on it and its like a whole new machine with boodles of free RAM.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comparison of start up and Shutdown time is an IDIOT test of the performance of an operating system. Do you measure the speed and performance of a car by how fast you can open the door and get in it, and how fast you can open the door and get out of it? Hell no.</p>
<p>You care about how fast the car goes and performs once you&#8217;re in it and its up and running. And in that case, XP blows Windows 7 and 8 out the water, totally. I mean, blows them away. For memory footprint, for speed of file copies, for amount of webbrowser windows you can have open, for everything. Windows XP smokes 7.</p>
<p>And a true power user rarely boots or shutdowns his computer, instead putting it to sleep. I dare say Windows XP coming out of sleep is even faster than Windows 7.</p>
<p>When these reviews came out comparing start up and shut down time, people bought it. We were all duped. In reality, Windows 7 is just a rebranded Windows Vista that everyone hated&#8230;. slow, buggy, doggy&#8230; it is no way a fixed slimmed down Vista. After 4 years of slogging around on 7 x64 on a dual core machine, I reformated it and put XP on it and its like a whole new machine with boodles of free RAM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Windows XP Better than Windows 7? A User’s Perspective by Nick</title>
		<link>http://hackadelic.com/is-windows-xp-better-than-windows-7-a-user%e2%80%99s-perspective/comment-page-1#comment-25151</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 08:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadelic.com/?p=520#comment-25151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The only reason that Windows XP was so user friendly was to create a market for it. This was done on purpose, there were even more things to download back then. So everyone wanted to have a computer and see movies, music, etc. Remember, that in the early days, they also tried to get everyone to buy new hardware because Windows XP wouldn&#039;t be compatible with Windows 98 SE hardware. A lot of people sold their stuff foolishly, but more complained and Microsoft ceded to the masses and came corrected their mistake by releasing the service packs.

It was a marketing scheme to create a dependency on it. And now that we depend on it as a tool, well, they want to squeeze their hand to see how much control they have over people. It won&#039;t work because what happens is that people will just turn their back on them and go back to using the yellow pages, buying from local stores, etc. In other words, it&#039;s back to normal.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only reason that Windows XP was so user friendly was to create a market for it. This was done on purpose, there were even more things to download back then. So everyone wanted to have a computer and see movies, music, etc. Remember, that in the early days, they also tried to get everyone to buy new hardware because Windows XP wouldn&#8217;t be compatible with Windows 98 SE hardware. A lot of people sold their stuff foolishly, but more complained and Microsoft ceded to the masses and came corrected their mistake by releasing the service packs.</p>
<p>It was a marketing scheme to create a dependency on it. And now that we depend on it as a tool, well, they want to squeeze their hand to see how much control they have over people. It won&#8217;t work because what happens is that people will just turn their back on them and go back to using the yellow pages, buying from local stores, etc. In other words, it&#8217;s back to normal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Windows XP Better than Windows 7? A User’s Perspective by F.A.</title>
		<link>http://hackadelic.com/is-windows-xp-better-than-windows-7-a-user%e2%80%99s-perspective/comment-page-1#comment-21396</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[F.A.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Nov 2013 12:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadelic.com/?p=520#comment-21396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, i agree, the XP runs better in my Low-End Netbook, even the programs run faster than in Windows 7. And you know? Windows 7 missed one program that can help the &quot;computer beginner&quot; to learn, that program called &quot;Tour&quot;, the &quot;Tour&quot; in Windows 7 is HTML only and even u must connected to the internet before you take a tour about &quot;How To Connect The Internet&quot; :D

Windows XP still the best OS in my heart, the word for Microsoft: WE DON&#039;T NEED THE NEW APPEARANCE THAT SLOWING THE COMPUTER AND NEED BIGGER RAM (JUST FOR SMOOTH 3D APPEARANCE???), WE JUST NEED THE SPEED AND COMPATIBILITY

The same case here is &quot;Mom&quot;, my Mom, even she confused using Windows 7 and push me to downgrade when i test Windows 7 in my computer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, i agree, the XP runs better in my Low-End Netbook, even the programs run faster than in Windows 7. And you know? Windows 7 missed one program that can help the &#8220;computer beginner&#8221; to learn, that program called &#8220;Tour&#8221;, the &#8220;Tour&#8221; in Windows 7 is HTML only and even u must connected to the internet before you take a tour about &#8220;How To Connect The Internet&#8221; 😀</p>
<p>Windows XP still the best OS in my heart, the word for Microsoft: WE DON&#8217;T NEED THE NEW APPEARANCE THAT SLOWING THE COMPUTER AND NEED BIGGER RAM (JUST FOR SMOOTH 3D APPEARANCE???), WE JUST NEED THE SPEED AND COMPATIBILITY</p>
<p>The same case here is &#8220;Mom&#8221;, my Mom, even she confused using Windows 7 and push me to downgrade when i test Windows 7 in my computer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Windows XP Better than Windows 7? A User’s Perspective by Albert</title>
		<link>http://hackadelic.com/is-windows-xp-better-than-windows-7-a-user%e2%80%99s-perspective/comment-page-1#comment-21250</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Albert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Nov 2013 22:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadelic.com/?p=520#comment-21250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with you, 
Win7 use very wasting memory and hard drive space at least you have 4 gig of RAM and require 5 times of hard drive space to run Win7 smoothly with newer processor, Windows XP can running very well with just dual core processor and 1 Gb.

The advantage of win7 was just little appearance modification but not essential.

Windows XP has better speed, functionality, compatibility with majority of software &#038; hardware, more efficient &#038; more stable.

Microsoft fault to built a more simple, efficient and better operating system.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you,<br />
Win7 use very wasting memory and hard drive space at least you have 4 gig of RAM and require 5 times of hard drive space to run Win7 smoothly with newer processor, Windows XP can running very well with just dual core processor and 1 Gb.</p>
<p>The advantage of win7 was just little appearance modification but not essential.</p>
<p>Windows XP has better speed, functionality, compatibility with majority of software &amp; hardware, more efficient &amp; more stable.</p>
<p>Microsoft fault to built a more simple, efficient and better operating system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
